{
  "$comment": "Single source for protocol + paper metadata shown on anivar.net. Do not duplicate these fields in page copy. Papers themselves are not edited from this file.",
  "issued": "2026-08-17",
  "protocol": {
    "name": "Corrigibility Schema Protocol",
    "version": "4.0",
    "repository": "https://github.com/anivar/corrigibility-schema",
    "skill": "https://skills.sh/anivar/corrigibility-schema",
    "changelog": "https://github.com/anivar/corrigibility-schema/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md"
  },
  "framework": {
    "repository": "https://github.com/anivar/corrigibility-framework",
    "license": "CC0-1.0",
    "orcid": "0009-0009-8995-0005"
  },
  "papers": {
    "dpi": {
      "id": "dpi",
      "number": "Paper I",
      "series": "DPI",
      "title": "Corrigibility as a Structural Precondition for Digital Public Infrastructure: A Cybernetic Framework",
      "revision": "rev. 11 Jul 2026",
      "pages": 54,
      "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6059075",
      "ssrn": "6059075",
      "released": "2026-04",
      "mirror": "/papers/ssrn-6059075.pdf",
      "html": "/papers/dpi/",
      "markdown": "/papers/dpi.md",
      "compatible_protocol": "4.0"
    },
    "epi": {
      "id": "epi",
      "number": "Paper II",
      "series": "EPI",
      "title": "Epistemic Capture and the Action Boundary: Corrigibility for Learned and Agentic Public Infrastructure",
      "revision": "rev. 11 Jul 2026",
      "pages": 37,
      "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6669318",
      "ssrn": "6669318",
      "released": "2026-07",
      "mirror": "/papers/ssrn-6669318.pdf",
      "html": "/papers/epi/",
      "markdown": "/papers/epi.md",
      "compatible_protocol": "4.0"
    }
  },
  "verification_tiers": [
    {
      "id": "presence",
      "name": "Presence",
      "description": "Laws, bodies and policies exist on paper."
    },
    {
      "id": "behaviour",
      "name": "Behaviour",
      "description": "Controls execute under stress; audits carry consequences."
    },
    {
      "id": "proof",
      "name": "Proof",
      "description": "Trust is continuously testable, authority is scoped and revocable, claims are machine-verifiable, failures are bounded."
    }
  ],
  "epi_adoption_tiers": [
    {
      "id": "trivial",
      "name": "trivial",
      "use": "Translation, summarization",
      "requirements": "Action boundaries required"
    },
    {
      "id": "decision_support",
      "name": "decision_support",
      "use": "RAG over government data",
      "requirements": "Open weights, local data storage"
    },
    {
      "id": "high_stakes",
      "name": "high_stakes",
      "use": "Welfare, policing, judicial",
      "requirements": "Full verified LWD-R; accountable-authority checkpoint"
    }
  ],
  "caveats": {
    "control_model": "The control-theoretic framing is an analytical abstraction used to organise structural necessity arguments. It is not a claim that public infrastructures are literally linear time-invariant control systems.",
    "empirical_scope": "The five-test set is a structural argument about open-loop failure modes. It is not a universally calibrated empirical theorem that every real system lacking any one test must fail in a fixed measurable period."
  }
}